Make a difference, join with GreenPolicy360's global work

Eco-nomics

From Green Policy
Jump to: navigation, search

Eco-nomics, a 21st Century paradigm in development @GreenPolicy360


ECO-NOMICS guidelines.jpg

 

[edit] "Eco-nomics" for the 21st Century

A Necessary Challenge to Neoliberal Economics
Turning from Short-Term to Long-Term Thinking
Environmental Full-cost Accounting


'Eco-nomics: A New Green Political Economy'
Eco-nomics & Ecological Economics
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Capitalism_and_the_Environment
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/New_Economy_Movement
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Stakeholder_Theory
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/B_Corporation
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Mondragon_Cooperative
http://p2pfoundation.net/


Commons-concepts permanent culture now s.png


The Commons
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/The_Commons


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Atmospheric_Science
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Air_Quality
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Biodiversity
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Climate_Policy
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_Observations
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Protection
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Security
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Security,_National_Security
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Externalities
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Extinction
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Natural_Resources
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Planet_Citizen
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Sustainability_Policies
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Whole_Earth


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


Eco-nomics: A Reflection on how new eco-ideas, especially from California, were carried to Washington and into political platforms


SJS / GreenPolicy Siterunner: (A brief personal review of environmental movement beginnings of "eco-nomics" as a "school of thought") In the mid-1970s, continuing what became a thirty plus year professional relationship with Congressman George E. Brown, I began to advocate developing a paradigm (ala Thomas Kuhn's definition of the scientific term) that extended environmental security concepts coming out of the student and environmental movement of the 1960s.

In the 1970s, I was a young editor at a NY publishing and printing company (Faculty Press) and at nights was immersed in a History of Ideas / Political Economy program at the Graduate Faculty of the New School, the New School for Social Research. Hannah Arendt was there when I arrived in the city and her reputation and the university's reputation as a "University in Exile" originally having attracted some of the top European liberal scholars in the world spoke to me of deep thinking.

Professors like Robert Heilbroner and David Gordon opened new vistas of thought as we introduced and debated capitalism versus new forms of economics that could begin to address conflicts and contradictions within capitalism. The legacy of world wars and the Vietnam war loomed in the rear-view mirror and the nuclear weapons brink of "mutually assured destruction" as the central strategic policy of the "Cold War" mentality loomed in pervasive form.

The political alternatives to conventional thinking found a voice in Democratic progressive politics. In 1976 I worked with Jerry Brown's presidential campaign and during this period the Governor became nationally known for his forward thinking (some, like Mike Royko in Chicago thought the Governor was a little too forward and ribbed him until years later Mike and most others saw the success of Governor's Brown's 'out in front' ideas.)



Over the 70s and 80s Congressman Brown and I spoke often and we regularly met in Washington DC. As a trained scientist/engineer, Congressman Brown continued as a strong voice in the science community and was focused intently on an array of environmental issues. The question of 'real security' not illusory security was at the core of both of our thinking and 'deep' environmental challenges were at the center of a new foundation of environmental legislation. During the period in the late 70s, the Congressman worked to draft the first federal legislation studying the question of global warming, as the AAAS completed its first reports. We spoke together and in our circles of the challenges of industrial policy (as it was called) and costs, costs of war to protect oil/gas and costs to the public from pollution to air, water, cities, health. The Congressman and our allies were working successfully shaping the first generation of environment laws and we were envisioning and achieving multiple goals in these endeavors.

Academically, a modern ecology/environmental movement was forming as a "school of thought" but this was more of a thread (in my opinion) than a deep current capturing the a more diverse, multi-dimension body of knowledge, belief and vision.

In the early 1990s I worked as a senior adviser with Jerry Brown in his presidential campaign, drafting an insurgent platform and bringing it forward and advocating a change in direction for the Democratic party, a "peace dividend", a focus on worker/environmental standards, a move away from dominance of 'money-in-politics' to a new type of populist politics. It wasn't to be although our campaign surprised and succeeded in its own way -- and so I moved on...

My drafting of the founding national Green Platform began after the 1992 Brown campaign platform and your siterunner chose to 'go independent' and build a serious, credible Green Party, first in New Mexico and then a formal, legal Green national party.



The concept of 'eco-nomics' advanced in my work.

My writing and political ventures explored eco-strategic ideas, a new concept of political economy and sustainability as I discussed it with George, and Jerry, and associates in many arenas. At the time, as a member of the Writers Guild and immersed in movie-making, bringing serious themes to the big screen, I wanted to go beyond Hollywood and a writer with whom I was working, Stirling Silliphant, urged me to leave the city if I wanted to do "serious writing." So, after much thought, in the late 1980s I moved from the beach in Santa Monica and Pacific Palisades to the high desert, to Santa Fe, a town named after St. Francis of Assisi. I lived on Camino del Monte Sol, under Sun Mountain, across from a Monastery and the campus of St. John's College. I became an adviser to the President of St. John's College as we attempted to fund and build a new library and sought, at first successfully the archives of Robert Hutchins and the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions as a core collection, then had to go back on our agreement when we were outvoted by the college's Annapolis directors.

My writing began every morning as monks chanted in the near distance and, in some ways, my original work reflected Bear & Company thoughts of that time as with Charlene Spretnak's "Spiritual Dimensions of Green Politics" and Matthew Fox were brought together with science that was revealing gathering threats to "the Commons".


New Definitions of National Security.png


The result was a more developed body of thought and work, "New Definitions of Security", and over the years these new definitions have expanded into security studies (as with Strategic Demands) and security briefs (as with Strategic Demands of the 21st Century: A New Vision for a New World, from conferences (Surviving Victory) to political platforms as foundations for presidential campaigning, Jerry Brown's in 1992, and on to the founding a new political party, the Greens in 2000.

The time for "Eco-nomics" is here and now. Let us explore new visions of security running deep with diversity.


Blue Marble photo - Apollo 17.jpg


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


Can capitalism, conservation, and cosmopolitanism coexist?

Via Grist / Nathanael Johnson / December 2016

https://grist.org/series/the-poverty-solution-put-people-first/
https://grist.org/article/how-do-we-fight-poverty-without-wrecking-the-planet/
https://grist.org/food/costa-rica-modernized-without-wrecking-the-environment-heres-how/
https://grist.org/food/what-the-humble-turnip-can-teach-us-about-economic-growth/
https://grist.org/food/how-food-forests-and-people-are-connected-in-10-charts/
https://grist.org/business-technology/the-case-for-putting-people-before-nature/
https://grist.org/business-technology/how-a-growing-timber-business-revived-a-forest/
https://grist.org/food/what-do-small-scale-farmers-want-for-the-future-and-for-their-kids/


Unbridled capitalism cannot accurately value nature, and does not recognize the property rights of the people who depend upon the natural world for survival. All of humanity depends upon natural systems, of course — but it’s the poor living off the land who have the most to lose from their destruction.

When capitalism is bridled and harnessed, so as to recognize the rights of the disenfranchised, it can provide prosperity and protect the environment.

As economist Amartya Sen has argued, the goal of economic growth is not simply growth, but the provision of liberty. When people have freedom — freedom from hunger, disease, and oppression, the liberties necessary to take the long view — they can protect the resources they depend upon, not to mention the creatures and landscapes they love.

If people in poorer countries need to take a more expensive, but less carbon intensive, path out of poverty, rich countries should be prepared to pay the difference. At the Paris climate summit and preceding meetings, leaders have set up a (totally Byzantine) system for making these sorts of payments. So far, affluent countries have promised more than they have contributed.

The faster poverty declines, the faster the natural systems that support human lives will rebound — and, most importantly, the freer those lives will be.


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


A Visible and Invisible Hand of Eco-nomics

http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2014/05/the-invisible-hand-of-eco-nomics.html

A Price Tag on Carbon as a Climate Rescue Plan


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


Eco-nomics: Are the Planet-Unfriendly Features of Capitalism Barriers to Sustainability? Abstract:

This paper argues that there are essential features of capitalist modes of production, consumption, and waste dispersal in interaction with the environment and its built-in systemic features that contradict long-term sustainable development.


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


The Rise Of ECO-nomics: From Ego to ECO

- How to improve future competitiveness and the environment by changing the corporate consciousness

http://studenttheses.cbs.dk/bitstream/handle/10417/2751/troels_m_kranker.pdf?sequence=1


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


ECO:nomics: Capitalism and the Environment - A Wall Street Journal perspective - http://economics.wsj.com/

"Fiduciary responsibility speaks of quarterly returns; survivability speaks to long-range vision and strategies"


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


Triple Bottom Line


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


Making room for a more complex view of what the obligations of managers might be


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


March 2015 -- Wall Street Journal forum -- ECO:nomics 2015 -- "New meaning of sustainability and the future of the environmental movement, where energy policy is heading"


Click here to view the 2015 WSJ ECO:nomics report.


Videos from ECO:nomics forum:

Does Clean Power Plan Threaten Grid?

Computers Will Optimize the Power Grid

EPA Admin. Says Carbon Regulation is Constitutional


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


Overview: History of Ideas, "Schools of Eco-nomics"

from the text

http://www.springer.com/us/book/9781402069659

http://down.cenet.org.cn/upfile/8/2008103018298186.pdf


Schools of Economics neoclassical tradition.png


________________________________________________


'Ecological Economics': An emerging paradigm

Sustainable economies, a new interdisciplinary framework that embraces the linkages among economic growth, environmental degradation, and social inequity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Daly

http://islandpress.org/herman-e-daly


"Blue-Green Eco-nomics: From the 1960s Forward


Env policy laws US 'the beginning' of env era.jpg


Global Security: Critical Security


US Public Law 95-367.png


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


Further Reading


Center for Economic and Policy Research, Washington DC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Economic_and_Policy_Research
http://cepr.net/about-us/board

Center for Popular Economics, Amherst, MA

http://www.populareconomics.org/

Dollars & Sense, Somerville, MA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollars_%26_Sense

Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Development_and_Environment_Institute
http://ase.tufts.edu/gdae/

Political Economy Research Institute, UMass, Amherst

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_Economy_Research_Institute

Progressive Economics Think Tanks

http://www.economicsforeveryone.ca/files/uploads/Progressive_Economics_Organizations.pdf



In 1970, a team of researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology began working on what would become the most important document of the 20th century to question this orthodoxy. The scientists spent two years holed up in the company of a gigantic mainframe computer, plugging data into a system dynamics model called World3, in the first large-scale effort to grasp the implications of growthism for mankind. They emerged with a book called The Limits to Growth, issued as a slim paperback by a little-known publisher in March of 1972. It exploded onto the scene, becoming the best-selling environmental title in history. In the Netherlands half a million copies sold within the year. More than three million copies have been sold to date in at least 30 languages.

Its message was commonsensical: If humans propagate, spread, build, consume, and pollute beyond the limits of our tiny spinning orb, we will have problems.


The message continues to resonate, the controversy over its limits to growth message continue to reverberate.


https://www.amazon.com/Limits-Growth-Donella-H-Meadows/dp/193149858X/


Limits to Growth screenshot-30yr-40yr updates.png



Environmental full-cost accounting

New Definitions of National Security

Sustainable Development



SJS / Siterunner: Again, looking back to the Graduate Faculty of the New School in New York, it would be appropriate to look at the political economic writing of one of my professors, David M Gordon, who passed away at a young age in 1996. As David spoke of long-term economics and coined the phrase “social structure of accumulation” (SSA) that augers the need to consider multi-generation impacts of economic activity. Let's look back and forward with David's co-author Thomas Weisskopf who writes of David at the 2014 David Gordon Memorial Lecture --- Reflections on 50 Years of Radical Political Economy

New School for Social Research / Political Economy-Liberal Studies-History of Ideas (1970-2000)

http://www.newschool.edu/nssr/history/
Gordon, David M. with Bowles, Samuel, "Beyond the Waste Land: A Democratic Alternative to Economic Decline" (1983) - https://www.amazon.com/Beyond-Waste-Land-Democratic-Alternative/dp/0385183453/
Gordon, David M. with Bowles, Samuel; Weisskopf, Thomas E. "After the Waste Land: Democratic Economics for the Year 2000 (1990) - https://www.amazon.com/After-Waste-Land-Democratic-Economics/dp/087332644X/

Publications of David Gordon Memorial Lecture Series - http://urpe.org/?page=rrpe&side=browse_content&sub=david_gordon_memorial_lecture

Center for American Progress

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_American_Progress
https://www.americanprogress.org/

Economic Policy Institute

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_Policy_Institute
http://www.epi.org/

Institute for New Economic Thinking

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_New_Economic_Thinking
https://www.ineteconomics.org/

Institute for Policy Studies

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Policy_Studies
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Policy_Studies

New America Foundation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_America_(organization)
http://www.newamerica.org/

Small Is Beautiful by E.F. Schmumacher (as interpreted by California Governor Jerry Brown)

SJS / Siterunner: One of my first conversations with Jerry Brown, which began a decades long association, had to do with Schumacher and a philosophy, a paradigm, that was gaining support in our nascent environmental movement...)

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-sac-climate-brown-profile-20151201-story.html / December 2015

Throughout his political career, Brown has displayed a desire to minimize society’s footprint on the Earth -- a stance that will gain a global platform when he arrives in Paris on Friday to participate in the U.N. summit on climate change.

In his spartan lifestyle as a young Jesuit seminarian, his famously barren apartment when he was governor the first time in the 1970s and his more recent campaign to slash greenhouse gas emissions, Brown has always explored ways to limit consumption.

Four decades ago, his focus on the environment -- talking of "Spaceship Earth" and exhortations that "small is beautiful" -- was a curiosity. But as 50,000 people gather in Paris in an ongoing effort to stop global warming, it’s clear that the world has caught up with Brown.

During his weeklong trip, the governor will tout California’s policies, rub shoulders with corporate executives, sign agreements with foreign leaders and be feted at the U.S. ambassador’s residence for his efforts to urge a stronger international accord at the summit.

“They’re not calling him Moonbeam anymore,” said Tom Hayden, an environmental activist and former state legislator who has worked with Brown for years. “This is his moment.”

Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics As If People Mattered

By E.F. Schumacher, Book published in 1973

Wikipedia: Schumacher argues that the modern economy is unsustainable. Natural resources (like fossil fuels), are treated as expendable income, when in fact they should be treated as capital, since they are not renewable, and thus subject to eventual depletion. He further argues that nature's resistance to pollution is limited as well. He concludes that government effort must be concentrated on sustainable development, because relatively minor improvements, for example, technology transfer to Third World countries, will not solve the underlying problem of an unsustainable economy.

Schumacher's philosophy is one of "enoughness", appreciating both human needs and limitations, and appropriate use of technology. It grew out of his study of village-based economics, which he later termed Buddhist economics, which is the subject of the book's fourth chapter.

He faults conventional economic thinking for failing to consider the most appropriate scale for an activity, blasts notions that "growth is good", and that "bigger is better", and questions the appropriateness of using mass production in developing countries, promoting instead "production by the masses". Schumacher was one of the first economists to question the appropriateness of using gross national product to measure human well-being, emphasizing that "the aim ought to be to obtain the maximum amount of well being with the minimum amount of consumption". In the epilogue he emphasizes the need for the "philosophy of materialism" to take second place to ideals such as justice, harmony, beauty, and health.

Tag: Sustainability; Eco-nomics; Future-Focus; QualityofLife


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


Green Eco-nomics

It is not a revelation to speak of green ideas as imbued with long-term thinking. The green vision has found roots and is spreading from local to global communities and the future is filled with the promise of green political thought.

It is sometimes said that "the future doesn't have a vote and, as a result, future generations are neglected". Greens think the future matters deeply and as evidenced in the wisdom of indigenous peoples like the Iroquois, who had a democratic system of governance that looked to "the seventh generation", green thinking speaks of 'the common interest' in decision-making. Green-leaning thought considers the future as "seventh generation thinking" extending beyond present demands and bringing forward key lessons and wisdom learned from the past. Green ideas are more needed than ever given the multiple challenges modern economic systems deliver with crises, contradictions and unsustainable growth.

Green ideas are brought forward in the founding 2000 platform of the US Green Party.

The Green platform captures a green "future-focus" and a "Call to Action" to move to a more sustainable eco-nomic system.


"Fiduciary responsibility goes to quarterly returns; survivability speaks to long-range vision and strategies" -- SJS


GreenPartyplatform cover of founding-platdoc-2000 s.png


Excerpt from the founding platform of the US Green Party / Key Values

http://gpus.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/platform_2000.pdf

https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Green_Party

http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Green_Politics


Eco-nomics from a Green Political Perspective

Excerpts from the US Green Party founding platform, 2000


GreenPartyPlatform 2000 KV10.png


Environmental Sustainability excerpt from US Green Party Platform 2000.png


Economic Sustainability - Eco-nomics excerpt from US Green Party Platform 2000.png



True-cost pricing and sustainability excerpt from US Green Party Platform 2000.png

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Log in / create account
GreenPolicy360
Navigation
Green Graphics
Recent Changes
GreenPolicy Social Media
GreenPolicy360 Network
Earthviews
Ecolivia
GreenPolitics Networking
Digital360
New Vision of Security
Countries & Maps
Archive Highlights
GrnPolicy Reviews
Online Eco-Education
Online Legis Info (U.S.)
Wiki Ballotpedia (U.S.)
Wiki Politics (U.S.)
Wikimedia Platform
Green News/Dailies
Green News Services (En)
Green Zines (En)
Green Lists @Wikipedia
Climate Action Headlines
Wikipedia on Climate
GrnNews Reddit Daily
Fact-Checking News Sites
GreenPolicy360 & Science
Tools