Ethics and Climate Change

Climate Action: An Ethical Responsibility

Beyond Preparing for Crisis Management

In 1977, the head of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in 1977, wrote a report for the National Academy of Sciences that concluded that CO2 released during the burning of fossil fuel could have consequences for climate that pose a considerable threat to future society.

Energy & Climate (1977) warning of the National Academy of Sciences

1979

In 1979 a follow-on National Science Academy report, commonly referenced as the "Charney Report: is released. The study was "In response to a request from the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy... the President of the National Academy of Sciences convened a study group under the auspices of the Climate Research Board of the National Research Council to assess the scientific basis for projection of possible future climatic changes resulting from man-made releases of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere." This study and report of national scientists is later seen as prescient and accurate in its global warming predictions.

Note the featuring of J. Hansen, Goddard Institute for Space Studies, NASA and S. Manabe, R.T. Wetherald, and K.Bryan, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, NOAA. The Chairman of the Study Group on Carbon Dioxide and Climate is Jule G. Charney (who years later would write of the report's accuracy in its predictions)

"[T]he responsibility of the carbon-dioxide problem is ours - we should accept it and act in a way that recognizes our role as trustees for future generations." (Charney et al., 1979) This report also estimated that the amount of warming that would be experienced from a doubling of the pre-industrial levels of CO2 would be 3 degrees C, very close to the amount that the "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change" would predict almost 30 years later."

• https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/12181/chapter/1

• https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/12181/carbon-dioxide-and-climate-a-scientific-assessment

• https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/12024/energy-and-climate-studies-in-geophysics

• https://phys.org/news/2019-07-charney-years-scientists-accurately-climate.html

In Geneva, Switzerland, a 'First World Climate Conference' convened in 1979 under the aegis of the World Meteorological Organization, a weather and science agency of the United Nations.

• https://public.wmo.int/en/bulletin/history-climate-activities

• https://public.wmo.int/en

• https://public.wmo.int/en/about-us/members

"Climate Declaration" released. This Declaration is the first of what becomes a series of international climate conferences.

The DECLARATION OF THE WORLD CLIMATE CONFERENCE

The World Climate Conference, a conference of experts on climate and mankind, held in Geneva, from 12 to 23 February 1979, was sponsored by the World Meteorological Organization in collaboration with other international bodies.

The specialists from many disciplines assembled for the Conference expressed their views concerning climatic variability and change and the implications for the world community. On the basis of their deliberations, they adopted the following: "An Appeal to Nations"

• https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3467449-First-World-Climate-Conference-Declaration.html

More on Climate and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO)

• https://library.wmo.int/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=97#.WOOzUnew1Bw

• https://library.wmo.int/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3030#.WOO0n3ew1Bx

• https://public.wmo.int/en/about-us/who-we-are/history-of-wmo

For over thirty-five years, the US Academy of Sciences has warned the US about the enormous threats of climate change with each successive report making stronger claims that human caused climate change is a serious threat to civilization. If the United States can be accused of failing to live up to its ethical responsibilities to the rest of the world on climate change, one cannot blame the US Academy of Sciences for failing to ring alarm bells. US citizens cannot claim that their most prestigious scientific institutions have failed to take a position on the seriousness of climate change.

The failure of the United States to respond to climate change can be attributed in largest part to a well-financed, well-organized climate change disinformation campaign. As Climate Ethics has previously cited, see "A New Kind of Crime Against Humanity?: The Fossil Fuel Industry's Disinformation Campaign On Climate Change". (Donald Brown, 2010a)

Climate Ethics has also repeatedly argued that the failure of the United States to respond to its ethical duties for climate change may also be attributed to the almost complete failure in the United States of the media and even climate change policy advocates to acknowledge that climate change raises not only national interests but also duties, responsibilities, and obligations to others.

• https://ethicsandclimate.org/

The Ethics and Climate site contains over 185 articles (as of 2017) including 13 videos on ethical issues raised by climate change. The site seeks to help policy makers and interested citizens understand the ethical dimensions of climate change issues in contention in policy debates.

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Ethics and The National Academy of Sciences

If climate change must be understood as a civilization challenging ethical issue, can the US Academy reports on climate change be criticized on ethical grounds?

The US Academy reports acknowledge that climate change has serious adverse world-wide impacts, that is impacts outside the United States. For instance, in its most recent report, the US Academy concluded that climate change would cause the following world-wide impacts:

• Water availability will decrease in many areas that are already drought-prone and in areas where rivers are fed by glaciers or snowpack;

• A higher fraction of rainfall will fall in the form of heavy precipitation, increasing the risk of flooding and, in some regions, the spread of water-borne illness;

• People and ecosystems in coastal zones will be exposed to higher storm surges, intrusion of salt water into freshwater aquifers, and other risks as sea levels rise;

• Coral reefs will experience widespread bleaching as a result of increasing temperatures, rising sea levels, and ocean acidification.

• https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/01/09/why-climate-change-is-an-ethical-problem/

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

The modern environmental era 'discovers' climate risks and scientific studies are launched with intent to protect...

In the UK

https://www.wired.com/story/meet-the-amateur-scientist-who-discovered-climate-change/ -- About Guy Callendar

In the US

Can our environment be saved? George E. Brown speaks to the US House of Representatives, 1969

Congressman Brown / Out in Front of Climate Action

• http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:Congressman_george.e.brown.gif

National Climate Program Act, 1978 / PDF

Drafted by Congressman Brown, the first federal climate legislation and scientific program to study and act on climate change - global warming.

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

The Initial US Climate Study/Report: Historic

Energy and Climate Report, 1977, National Academy of Sciences / 175 pp. / PDF via GreenPolicy360

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

James Hansen's Warning to Congress in 1988:

Ten years after the National Climate Program Act was drafted by Representative Brown and the legislation's passage led by the Congressman began the federal government's study of climate change, impacts and risks.

http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:Hansen-testimony-1988.jpg

○