File:Ostrom - the challenge of seeing possibilities to save the commons.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Green Policy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:


<big>'''In response to the Question of the 'Tragedy of the Commons''''</big>
<big>'''Ostrom v Hardin.... The tragedy of the commons is not inevitable.... as a simplified theory, it is a false and dangerous myth'''</big>
Via Aeon
By  Michelle Nijhuis
Project editor at The Atlantic and author of [https://www.amazon.com/Beloved-Beasts-Fighting-Life-Extinction/dp/1324001682 Beloved Beasts: Fighting for Life in an Age of Extinction (2021)]
May 2021
* https://aeon.co/essays/the-tragedy-of-the-commons-is-a-false-and-dangerous-myth
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons
''In December 1968, the ecologist and biologist Garrett Hardin had an essay published in the journal Science called [https://science.sciencemag.org/content/162/3859/1243 ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’]. His proposition was simple and unsparing: humans, when left to their own devices, compete with one another for resources until the resources run out. ‘Ruin is the destination toward which all men rush, each pursuing his own best interest,’ he wrote. ‘Freedom in a commons brings ruin to all.’ Hardin’s argument made intuitive sense, and provided a temptingly simple explanation for catastrophes of all kinds – traffic jams, dirty public toilets, species extinction. His essay, widely read and accepted, would become one of the most-cited scientific papers of all time.''
''Even before Hardin’s ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’ was published, however, the young political scientist Elinor Ostrom had proven him wrong....''
''Community-based conservation can’t solve everything, and it doesn’t always succeed in protecting the commons. In many cases, national governments don’t recognise the longstanding land claims of Indigenous and other rural communities, creating uncertainty that interferes with community efforts to manage for the long term. Even well-established systems are vulnerable to internal conflict, and to external pressures ranging from drought to war to global market forces. As Ostrom often reminds... any strategy can succeed or fail. Community-based conservation is distinctive because many societies have only begun to understand – or remember – its potential. "What we have ignored is what citizens can do."
[[Category:Air Quality]]
[[Category:Alternative Agriculture]]
[[Category:Aquifers]]
[[Category:Anthropocene]]
[[Category:Atmosphere]]
[[Category:Atmospheric Science]]
[[Category:City Governments]]
[[Category:City-County Governments]]
[[Category:Clean Water]]
[[Category:Climate Change]]
[[Category:Climate Policy]]
[[Category:Earth]]
[[Category:Earth System Science]]
[[Category:Eco-nomics]]
[[Category:Ecological Economics]]
[[Category:Ecology Studies]]
[[Category:Economic Development]]
[[Category:Economic Justice]]
[[Category:Economics]]
[[Category:Environmental Protection]]
[[Category:Environmental Security]]
[[Category:Externalities]]
[[Category:EOS eco Operating System]]
[[Category:Food]]
[[Category:Forests]]
[[Category:Global Security]]
[[Category:Global Warming]]
[[Category:Green Best Practices]]
[[Category:Green Banking]]
[[Category:Green Business]]
[[Category:Green Infrastructure]]
[[Category:Green Graphics]]
[[Category:Green Politics]]
[[Category:Green Values]]
[[Category:Health]]
[[Category:Initiatives]]
[[Category:Labor Unions]]
[[Category:Natural Resources]]
[[Category:Natural Resource Economics]]
[[Category:New Definitions of National Security]]
[[Category:Networking]]
[[Category:New Economy]]
[[Category:Ocean Ecosystem]]‏‎
[[Category:Ocean Science‏‎]]
[[Category:Ocean Sustainability]]‏‎
[[Category:Oceans]]
[[Category:Permaculture]]
[[Category:Planet Citizen]]
[[Category:Planet Citizens]]
[[Category:Planet Scientist]]
[[Category:Planet Citizens, Planet Scientists]]
[[Category:Resilience]]
[[Category:Rights of Nature]]
[[Category:Sea-level Rise]]
[[Category:Sharing Economy]]
[[Category:Social Justice]]
[[Category:Strategic Demands]]
[[Category:Sustainability Policies]]
[[Category:ThinBlueLayer]]
[[Category:Toxics and Pollution]]
[[Category:United Nations]]
[[Category:US Environmental Protection Agency]]
[[Category:Digital Citizen]]
[[Category:Digital Rights]]
[[Category:Education]]
[[Category:EOS eco Operating System]]
[[Category:Green Politics]]
[[Category:Human Rights]]
[[Category:Internet]]
[[Category:Mobile Internet]]
[[Category:Online Education]]
[[Category:Online Privacy]]
[[Category:Planet API]]
[[Category:Planet Citizen]]
[[Category:Planet Citizens, Planet Scientists]]
[[Category:World Wide Web]]

Latest revision as of 20:13, 6 May 2021


In response to the Question of the 'Tragedy of the Commons'


Ostrom v Hardin.... The tragedy of the commons is not inevitable.... as a simplified theory, it is a false and dangerous myth

Via Aeon

By Michelle Nijhuis

Project editor at The Atlantic and author of Beloved Beasts: Fighting for Life in an Age of Extinction (2021)

May 2021


In December 1968, the ecologist and biologist Garrett Hardin had an essay published in the journal Science called ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’. His proposition was simple and unsparing: humans, when left to their own devices, compete with one another for resources until the resources run out. ‘Ruin is the destination toward which all men rush, each pursuing his own best interest,’ he wrote. ‘Freedom in a commons brings ruin to all.’ Hardin’s argument made intuitive sense, and provided a temptingly simple explanation for catastrophes of all kinds – traffic jams, dirty public toilets, species extinction. His essay, widely read and accepted, would become one of the most-cited scientific papers of all time.

Even before Hardin’s ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’ was published, however, the young political scientist Elinor Ostrom had proven him wrong....

Community-based conservation can’t solve everything, and it doesn’t always succeed in protecting the commons. In many cases, national governments don’t recognise the longstanding land claims of Indigenous and other rural communities, creating uncertainty that interferes with community efforts to manage for the long term. Even well-established systems are vulnerable to internal conflict, and to external pressures ranging from drought to war to global market forces. As Ostrom often reminds... any strategy can succeed or fail. Community-based conservation is distinctive because many societies have only begun to understand – or remember – its potential. "What we have ignored is what citizens can do."



○‏‎‏‎

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current20:13, 6 May 2021Thumbnail for version as of 20:13, 6 May 2021640 × 282 (58 KB)Siterunner (talk | contribs)

The following page uses this file: