File:Varsha ys.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Green Policy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:


Image Credit: Varsha Y S via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA
<big>'''''How does our world work on a subatomic level?'''''</big>
''The Standard Model. What dull name for the most accurate scientific theory known to human beings.''
''More than a quarter of the Nobel Prizes in physics of the last century are direct inputs to or direct results of the Standard Model. Yet its name suggests that if you can afford a few extra dollars a month you should buy the upgrade. As a theoretical physicist, I’d prefer The Absolutely Amazing Theory of Almost Everything. That’s what the Standard Model really is.''
''Many recall the excitement among scientists and media over the 2012 discovery of the Higgs boson. But that much-ballyhooed event didn’t come out of the blue – it capped a five-decade undefeated streak for the Standard Model. Every fundamental force but gravity is included in it. Every attempt to overturn it to demonstrate in the laboratory that it must be substantially reworked – and there have been many over the past 50 years – has failed.''
''In short, the Standard Model answers this question: What is everything made of, and how does it hold together?''
[https://www.universal-sci.com/headlines/2018/5/27/-the-standard-model-of-particle-physics-the-absolutely-amazing-theory-of-almost-everything '''''The Standard Model''''']
[[Category:Citizen Science]]
[[Category:Ecology Studies]]
[[Category:Environmental Security]]
[[Category:Green Graphics]]
[[Category:Planet Citizen]]
[[Category:Planet Citizens]]
[[Category:Planet Scientist]]
[[Category:Planet Citizens, Planet Scientists]]
[[Category:Strategic Demands]]

Latest revision as of 17:21, 16 June 2018

Image Credit: Varsha Y S via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA


How does our world work on a subatomic level?

The Standard Model. What dull name for the most accurate scientific theory known to human beings.

More than a quarter of the Nobel Prizes in physics of the last century are direct inputs to or direct results of the Standard Model. Yet its name suggests that if you can afford a few extra dollars a month you should buy the upgrade. As a theoretical physicist, I’d prefer The Absolutely Amazing Theory of Almost Everything. That’s what the Standard Model really is.

Many recall the excitement among scientists and media over the 2012 discovery of the Higgs boson. But that much-ballyhooed event didn’t come out of the blue – it capped a five-decade undefeated streak for the Standard Model. Every fundamental force but gravity is included in it. Every attempt to overturn it to demonstrate in the laboratory that it must be substantially reworked – and there have been many over the past 50 years – has failed.

In short, the Standard Model answers this question: What is everything made of, and how does it hold together?


The Standard Model

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current17:17, 16 June 2018Thumbnail for version as of 17:17, 16 June 2018640 × 363 (46 KB)Siterunner (talk | contribs)

The following page uses this file: