File:Nuclear war - small nukes are a misnomer - Potsdam.png: Difference between revisions

From Green Policy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:


<big>'''Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research'''</big>
'''''Limited nuclear war ... dangerous far beyond the region fatally hit'''''
* https://www.pik-potsdam.de/en
* https://www.pik-potsdam.de/en/news/latest-news/regional-nuclear-war-a-risk-for-global-food-security
''Even a limited nuclear war could have dangerous effects far beyond the region that is fatally hit. It would result in global cooling that substantially reduces agricultural production in the world’s main breadbasket regions, from the US, to Europe, Russia, and China. The particular effect on food security worldwide including trade responses has now for the first time been revealed by an international team of scientists in a study based on advanced computer simulations. The sudden temperature reduction would lead to a food system shock unprecedented in documented history. It would not undo long-term climate change from fossil fuels use, though – after about a decade of cooling, global warming would surge again.''
[[File:Earth Flag-2.png]]
<big>'''Strategic Demands'''</big>
'''''Regional Nuclear Conflict will deliver, science says, Global Nuclear Catastrophe'''''
* https://strategicdemands.com/regional-nuclear-conflict-global-nuclear-catastrophe/
* https://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-issues-cold-war-2-0/
@StrategicDemands.com:
''As nuclear treaties, agreements, and negotiations fall by the wayside, the JCPOA, the INF, NewSTART, and others, and the U.S., Russia, and China race to build a next generation of nuclear capabilities, there are those, like Lindsey Graham from South Carolina who seem to be saying that if U.S. negotiations with North Korea fail, then war is the answer, one way or the other, seeming to say that nuclear exchanges are acceptable. Nuclear weapons use, nuclear weapons exchanges are not acceptable.''
''What is rarely understood is the current new nuclear arms race, with new warheads, new MIRVs, new (nuclear) pit production, new delivery systems, new tactical (‘usable’) nukes, new ‘dial-up’ nukes, new cruise nukes, new hypersonic nukes…''
''The collapse of nuclear arms control architecture is accompanied by multi-nation, multi-billion spending, much of it in secret, a race toward human and environmental disaster. The next generation of nuclear weapons is not providing added security, it is delivering a ticking clock…''
(SJS)
🌎
Updated / First week of February 2022
* https://strategicdemands.com/bigger-picture-beyond-the-ukraine-conflict/
* https://strategicdemands.com/a-proposed-ukraine-fix-act-now-to-expand-the-inf-agreement/
* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Nuclear_Nonproliferation
January 2022
A Proposed Ukraine Fix: Act Now to Expand the INF Agreement
* https://strategicdemands.com/a-proposed-ukraine-fix-act-now-to-expand-the-inf-agreement/
[[File:StratDem Proposed Russia-Ukraine Fix.png|link=https://strategicdemands.com/a-proposed-ukraine-fix-act-now-to-expand-the-inf-agreement/]]
&nbsp;
:[[File:Blue green lines 1.png]]
&nbsp;
2019
[[File:StratDem logo.png]]
[[File:Russia-US intermediate range nuclear forces treaty-INF in danger.png]]
<small>https://www.nti.org/search/?f-search=inf+treaty&f-order=relevance</small>
[[Category:Ukraine]]
[[Category:United Nations]]
[[Category:Anthropocene]]
[[Category:Eurasia]]
[[Category:Environmental Security]]
[[Category:Environmental Security, National Security]]
[[Category:Europe]]
[[Category:European Union]]
[[Category:Global Security]]
[[Category:Green Graphics]]
[[Category:Green Party]]
[[Category:Green Politics]]
[[Category:Middle East]]
[[Category:New Definitions of National Security]]
[[Category:North America]]
[[Category:Nuclear Free]]
[[Category:Nuclear Nonproliferation]]
[[Category:Nuclear Proliferation]]
[[Category:Nuclear Weapons]]
[[Category:Peace]]
[[Category:Radioactive Pollution]]
[[Category:Radioactive Waste]]
[[Category:Russian Federation]]
[[Category:Strategic Demands]]
[[Category:Threat Multiplier]]
[[Category:Whole Earth]]
[[Category:China]]
[[Category:France]]
[[Category:India]]
[[Category:Israel]]
[[Category:North Korea]]
[[Category:Pakistan]]
[[Category:Russian Federation]]
[[Category:UK]]
[[Category:US]]

Latest revision as of 14:47, 5 March 2022


Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

Limited nuclear war ... dangerous far beyond the region fatally hit


Even a limited nuclear war could have dangerous effects far beyond the region that is fatally hit. It would result in global cooling that substantially reduces agricultural production in the world’s main breadbasket regions, from the US, to Europe, Russia, and China. The particular effect on food security worldwide including trade responses has now for the first time been revealed by an international team of scientists in a study based on advanced computer simulations. The sudden temperature reduction would lead to a food system shock unprecedented in documented history. It would not undo long-term climate change from fossil fuels use, though – after about a decade of cooling, global warming would surge again.


Earth Flag-2.png


Strategic Demands

Regional Nuclear Conflict will deliver, science says, Global Nuclear Catastrophe


@StrategicDemands.com:

As nuclear treaties, agreements, and negotiations fall by the wayside, the JCPOA, the INF, NewSTART, and others, and the U.S., Russia, and China race to build a next generation of nuclear capabilities, there are those, like Lindsey Graham from South Carolina who seem to be saying that if U.S. negotiations with North Korea fail, then war is the answer, one way or the other, seeming to say that nuclear exchanges are acceptable. Nuclear weapons use, nuclear weapons exchanges are not acceptable.

What is rarely understood is the current new nuclear arms race, with new warheads, new MIRVs, new (nuclear) pit production, new delivery systems, new tactical (‘usable’) nukes, new ‘dial-up’ nukes, new cruise nukes, new hypersonic nukes…

The collapse of nuclear arms control architecture is accompanied by multi-nation, multi-billion spending, much of it in secret, a race toward human and environmental disaster. The next generation of nuclear weapons is not providing added security, it is delivering a ticking clock…


(SJS)


🌎


Updated / First week of February 2022


January 2022

A Proposed Ukraine Fix: Act Now to Expand the INF Agreement


StratDem Proposed Russia-Ukraine Fix.png


 

Blue green lines 1.png

 


2019


StratDem logo.png


Russia-US intermediate range nuclear forces treaty-INF in danger.png

https://www.nti.org/search/?f-search=inf+treaty&f-order=relevance

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current14:01, 5 March 2022Thumbnail for version as of 14:01, 5 March 2022480 × 505 (442 KB)Siterunner (talk | contribs)

The following 2 pages use this file: