File:George Monbiot-Our World in Data-Population.jpg: Difference between revisions
Siterunner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Siterunner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
''First, the headline figures. Global population growth today is 1.05%. That’s half the peak growth rate, reached in 1963 (2.2%). | ''First, the headline figures. Global population growth today is 1.05%. That’s half the peak growth rate, reached in 1963 (2.2%).'' | ||
In other words, population growth is not, as many claim, exponential. The rate is falling rapidly. By contrast, until the pandemic, global economic growth had been hovering around 3% for several years, and was expected to stay there. In other words, it *was* exponential.'' | ''In other words, population growth is not, as many claim, exponential. The rate is falling rapidly. By contrast, until the pandemic, global economic growth had been hovering around 3% for several years, and was expected to stay there. In other words, it *was* exponential.'' | ||
''After the (coronavirus) lockdowns, governments will do everything they can to get it back on track.'' | ''After the (coronavirus) lockdowns, governments will do everything they can to get it back on track.'' | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
As Our World in Data notes: | |||
''“Even several billion additional people in low-income countries … would leave global emissions almost unchanged. 3 or 4 billion low income individuals would only account for a few percent of global CO2."'' | |||
* https://ourworldindata.org/co2-by-income-region | * https://ourworldindata.org/co2-by-income-region |
Revision as of 22:29, 7 May 2020
George Monbiot
Review of Planet of the Humans
Let us look at Our World in Data and population growth
Thread
May 7, 2020
Via The Guardian / by George Monbiot @GeorgeMonbiot
First, the headline figures. Global population growth today is 1.05%. That’s half the peak growth rate, reached in 1963 (2.2%).
In other words, population growth is not, as many claim, exponential. The rate is falling rapidly. By contrast, until the pandemic, global economic growth had been hovering around 3% for several years, and was expected to stay there. In other words, it *was* exponential.
After the (coronavirus) lockdowns, governments will do everything they can to get it back on track.
As Our World in Data notes:
“Even several billion additional people in low-income countries … would leave global emissions almost unchanged. 3 or 4 billion low income individuals would only account for a few percent of global CO2."
~
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 17:14, 7 May 2020 | 585 × 635 (100 KB) | Siterunner (talk | contribs) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
The following 2 pages use this file: