Stats - Green Research & Science: Difference between revisions
Siterunner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Siterunner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<big>'''Science Counts'''</big> | <big>'''Science Counts'''</big> | ||
● ''' | ● '''First, a 'scholarly test' @ Google Scholar''' -- Go online to https://scholar.google.com/ | ||
: | :Type in "Eco-nomics" and compare content from scholarly journals cited by Google with what's available at GreenPolicy360 -- https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Eco-nomics | ||
Revision as of 18:06, 22 July 2017
Science Counts
● First, a 'scholarly test' @ Google Scholar -- Go online to https://scholar.google.com/
- Type in "Eco-nomics" and compare content from scholarly journals cited by Google with what's available at GreenPolicy360 -- https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Eco-nomics
GreenPolicy360: Our Position on the Copious Use of Science
A central goal of GreenPolicy360 is to provide news of environmental and related political and economic initiatives, science and data.
As an eco-resource reporting developments within a wide range of environmental fields, GreenPolicy360 looks to facts and 'good' science.
Our site attempts to be an e-resource that features reporting that is factual and verifiable. We approach eco-questions and -challenges with a problem-solving perspective.
In general, when considering questions of environmental risk, environmental security and action agendas, we advocate far-sighted approaches following the "precautionary principle".
When posting content to the GreenPolicy wiki community we urge focusing on facts and science as it endeavors to provide policy and political guidance.
We recommend sites like the Stats science website among many online sources established to investigate claims made regarding environmental science and critical issues regarding climate change.
Within the rainbow of reporting of green/environmental science and eco-news, we welcome fact-checking and reasoned discussion and debate.
