New Definitions of National Security: Difference between revisions

From Green Policy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 21: Line 21:
: [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:New_Definitions_of_National_Security '''@ StrategicDemands: "New Definitions of National Security"''']  
: [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:New_Definitions_of_National_Security '''@ StrategicDemands: "New Definitions of National Security"''']  


<big>'''Recalling that Green Politics in modern times began at the front lines of the Nuclear Era and Cold War Threat'''</big>
[[File:Nuclear Threat Sept 19, 2017.png]]
<big>'''''2017'''''</big>
@ Strategic Demands / StratDem
http://strategicdemands.com/a-nuclear-meme/
'''''What is it there for, if it can’t be used?
— The US President
:● http://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-issues-cold-war-2-0/
:● http://strategicdemands.com/stewards-of-the-apocalypse/
:● http://strategicdemands.com/costsofwar/
:● http://strategicdemands.com/oversight-us-nuclear-arsenal/
:● http://strategicdemands.com/no-one-should-have-singular-nuclear-launch-authority/
:● http://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-hair-trigger/
:● http://strategicdemands.com/?s=hairtrigger
:● http://strategicdemands.com/thermonuclear-north-korea-sends-message/
::<font color=green>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○</font> <font color=blue>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○</font>
<big>'''We Must Change our Vision of Security from an Era of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) to Nuclear Nonproliferation'''</big>
:● http://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-weapons-treaty-adopted-historic-moment/
:● http://strategicdemands.com/long-game-diplomacy-war/
:● http://strategicdemands.com/status-nuclear-ban-negotiations/
:● http://strategicdemands.com/the-trump-doctrine/
:● http://strategicdemands.com/day-to-remember-june-1-2017/
:● http://strategicdemands.com/the-way-of-war/
:● http://strategicdemands.com/eco-nomics-new-definitions-security/
::<font color=green>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○</font> <font color=blue>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○</font>
<big>'''We Must Change our Vision of Security to an International and Global Umbrella of Cooperation, 'Eco-nomics' and Sustainable Progress'''</big>




Line 32: Line 101:
:● <big><u>[[Earth Science Vital Signs]]</u></big>
:● <big><u>[[Earth Science Vital Signs]]</u></big>


: [https://www.carbonbrief.org/mapped-climate-change-laws-around-world <big><u>'''Climate Change Laws Around the World'''</u></big>]
: [http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Global-trends-in-climate-change-legislation-and-litigation-WEB.pdf <big><u>'''Trends in Climate Change Legislation'''</u></big>]




Line 58: Line 123:




● [http://www.planetcitizen.org '''www.planetcitizen.org''']
:● [http://www.planetcitizen.org '''www.planetcitizen.org''']
 
:● [http://www.planetcitizens.org '''www.planetcitizens.org''']
 




Line 93: Line 161:


:● http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security/
:● http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security/
:● http://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-issues-cold-war-2-0/


:● http://strategicdemands.com/costsofwar/
:● http://strategicdemands.com/costsofwar/
Line 100: Line 166:




<big>'''US House of Representatives Majority Party Says 'No' to Pentagon Prepping for Climate Impacts/Disruption'''</big>  
<big>'''US House of Representatives Says 'No' to Pentagon Prepping for Climate Impacts/Disruption'''</big>  


[http://strategicdemands.com/republicans-vote-to-block-national-security/ '''''Republicans in US Congress Vote to Block National & Global Security''''']
[http://strategicdemands.com/republicans-vote-to-block-national-security/ '''''Republicans in US Congress Vote to Block National & Global Security''''']
Line 127: Line 193:




; <big>'''''Undercutting Security, 2015/16, US Congress Committees Attempts to Cut Earth Science Research'''''</big>
; <big>'''Undercutting Security: 2015/16, US Congress Attempts to Cut Earth Science Research'''''</big>
 
 
[http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_and_Space,_Politics '''Earth and Space, Politics''']




Line 140: Line 203:




'''Earth Science, NASA Climate Change Research Continues In Peril'''
; <big> '''Earth Science, NASA Climate Change Research Continues In Peril'''</big>
 


[http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/04/30/nasa_budget_gop_committee_wants_to_slash_and_burn_earth_sciences.html "Slash and Burn Earth Sciences"]
[http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/04/30/nasa_budget_gop_committee_wants_to_slash_and_burn_earth_sciences.html "Slash and Burn Earth Sciences"]
Line 148: Line 212:




[https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/05/01/statement-ostp-director-john-p-holdren-house-proposed-funding-cuts-nasas-critical-ea '''Re: funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs''']
[https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/05/01/statement-ostp-director-john-p-holdren-house-proposed-funding-cuts-nasas-critical-ea '''Funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs?''']




Line 164: Line 228:




○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
[[File:Line160x12.jpg]]
 
 


; <big><big>Environmental Law</big></big>




; <big><big>The Security Horizon</big></big>
'''Environmental Protections Nationally and Globally '''




'''National Security: Placed at Risk by Undercutting Environmental Security Policy & Practices'''
: [https://www.carbonbrief.org/mapped-climate-change-laws-around-world <big><u>'''Climate Change Laws Around the World'''</u></big>]


(@GreenPolicy360)
: [http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Global-trends-in-climate-change-legislation-and-litigation-WEB.pdf <big><u>'''Trends in Climate Change Legislation'''</u></big>]




http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_and_Space,_Politics


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Science_Research_from_Space
[[File:Earth Right Now.png]]


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Science_Vital_Signs




[[File:Earth Right Now.png]]
:● http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Right_Now


:● http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_Observations


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Right_Now
:● http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_Science_from_Space


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_Observations


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_Science_from_Space


[[File:Blue green lines 1.png]]






Line 230: Line 294:


[[File:Line448x15.png]]
[[File:Line448x15.png]]




Line 236: Line 301:




[[File:Western USA ISS-ScottKelly (08-10-15).jpg]]




Line 249: Line 314:
[[Category:Education]]
[[Category:Education]]
[[Category:Energy]]
[[Category:Energy]]
[[Category:Environmental Protection]]
[[Category:Environmental Security]]
[[Category:Environmental Security]]
[[Category:Environmental Security, National Security]]
[[Category:Environmental Security, National Security]]

Revision as of 21:29, 19 September 2017

Over the Pacific August 2015.png


GreenPolicy continues to advance new horizons of security -- local, national and global ...


Environment and Security.jpg


New Definitions of National & Global Security


Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ — Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ


Environmental Security ↔ National Security


National Security: Enhanced via Environmental Security
@ StrategicDemands: "New Definitions of National Security"


Recalling that Green Politics in modern times began at the front lines of the Nuclear Era and Cold War Threat


Nuclear Threat Sept 19, 2017.png


2017


@ Strategic Demands / StratDem


http://strategicdemands.com/a-nuclear-meme/


What is it there for, if it can’t be used?

— The US President


http://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-issues-cold-war-2-0/
http://strategicdemands.com/stewards-of-the-apocalypse/
http://strategicdemands.com/costsofwar/


http://strategicdemands.com/oversight-us-nuclear-arsenal/
http://strategicdemands.com/no-one-should-have-singular-nuclear-launch-authority/
http://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-hair-trigger/
http://strategicdemands.com/?s=hairtrigger
http://strategicdemands.com/thermonuclear-north-korea-sends-message/


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


We Must Change our Vision of Security from an Era of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) to Nuclear Nonproliferation


http://strategicdemands.com/nuclear-weapons-treaty-adopted-historic-moment/
http://strategicdemands.com/long-game-diplomacy-war/
http://strategicdemands.com/status-nuclear-ban-negotiations/
http://strategicdemands.com/the-trump-doctrine/
http://strategicdemands.com/day-to-remember-june-1-2017/
http://strategicdemands.com/the-way-of-war/
http://strategicdemands.com/eco-nomics-new-definitions-security/


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


We Must Change our Vision of Security to an International and Global Umbrella of Cooperation, 'Eco-nomics' and Sustainable Progress


Climate Change / Climate Science


Climate News
Earth Right Now
Earth Science Vital Signs


Earth Science Research from Space


Earth from the ISS.gif



US Politics & Earth Science/Atmospheric Science
Earth Observations
Environmental Security]
Global Security


Blue green lines 1.png


www.planetcitizen.org
www.planetcitizens.org


SJS / GreenPolicy360 Siterunner:

Over the decades, in my political work, I have endeavored to develop "new definitions of national security."

In the late 1960s, inspired by the nascent moments of the modern environmental movement with images from an Apollo mission of the Earth rising from beyond the moon, a life-changing January 1969 cover of Life Magazine, and 'Whole Earth' realizations being shared for the first time, I began my involvement in larger strategic questions.

My initial political mentor George E. Brown and new relationships with thoughtful figures such as Dan Ellsberg at Rand Institute in Santa Monica brought insight into war and peace and challenged me.

The opportunity to become involved in the first Earth Day expanded my vision far beyond academic constraints and I began to explore connections between environmental security and international, global affairs.

Today the mission continues: To create a new security paradigm, a school of thought that identifies and advances contours of "real and resilient security".


Strategic Demands: A New Vision for a New World
Security Brief prepared for the Green Institute by Roger Morris & Steven Schmidt


Strategic Demands @ GreenPolicy360


Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ --- Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ


New Definitions of National Security.png


Visit GreenPolicy's Associate -- Strategic Demands

http://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-of-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/costsofwar/


US House of Representatives Says 'No' to Pentagon Prepping for Climate Impacts/Disruption

Republicans in US Congress Vote to Block National & Global Security


NASA Earth Sciences 2016 Budget No Longer Cut $500 Million


The final budget bill provides $1.92 billion for Earth Science research. The cut is slight compared to initial GOP budget cuts proposed in the House and Senate which had slashed as much as $500 million from the President's request.

NASA administrator Charles Bolden argued before Congress this summer and fall that it was critical to increase the size of NASA's Earth Science programs.

Under the newly passed Fiscal Year 2016 NASA Budget, virtually all of the agency’s programs benefit with either full or added funding.


National-Security.001.png


http://strategicdemands.com/nasa-pushes-earth-science-to-strengthen-security-capabilities/


Earth Day Flag.png


Undercutting Security: 2015/16, US Congress Attempts to Cut Earth Science Research


"House Science Committee guts NASA Earth sciences budget... attack on climate research and responses"


"Republicans in the House and Senate don't want NASA studying Earth..."


Earth Science, NASA Climate Change Research Continues In Peril


"Slash and Burn Earth Sciences"



Funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs?


On May 1, 2015, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Dr. John P. Holdren issued the following statement on proposed funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs:

"If enacted, the NASA authorization bill headed to the House floor later this month would do serious damage to the Nation’s space program, as well as to Earth-observation and Earth-science programs essential for predicting, preparing for, and minimizing the damage from disasters both natural and human-induced...

The House bill would also gut the NASA “mission to planet Earth”—the satellite observations and related research that provide key measurements and insights relevant to forecasting and tracking hurricanes, fighting wildfires, observing the state of the world’s farms and forests, mapping the extent of droughts, measuring the stocks of groundwater, and monitoring the likelihood of landslides. The draconian cuts in the House bill would also delay advances in our ability to research and prepare for volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and tsunamis and blind us to changes in the Earth’s oceans and ice sheets that can be discerned only from space.

NASA’s mission to observe, understand, and explore the solar system and the cosmos beyond has long been matched in importance by its mission to use the unrivaled vantage point of Earth orbit for looking downward, to better understand the only home that humanity currently has. It is difficult to understand why, at this time of U.S. leadership in both the outward-facing and inward-facing facets of NASA’s operations in space, the Congress would want to undermine that leadership and sacrifice the panoply of benefits it brings to the Nation."


Visit NASA Science @ GreenPolicy360


Line160x12.jpg


Environmental Law


Environmental Protections Nationally and Globally


Climate Change Laws Around the World
Trends in Climate Change Legislation


Earth Right Now.png


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Right_Now
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_Observations
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_Science_from_Space


Blue green lines 1.png


National Security & Environmental Security: Editorial Opinion from GreenPolicy's Associate, Strategic Demands

(@StrategicDemands)


http://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-of-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/priorities-skew-away-from-nasa-and-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security-2/
http://strategicdemands.com/security-design/
http://strategicdemands.com/ground-truth/
http://strategicdemands.com/stratdem-factoid-re-road-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-national-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/speaking-environmental-security/


You can manage only what you can measure Dr David Crisp, OCO-2, June 2014 m.jpg


Tag: Eco-nomics, a 21st Century paradigm in development @GreenPolicy360


Line448x15.png


Strategic Demands of the 21st Century A New Vision for a New World.png