New Definitions of National Security: Difference between revisions
Siterunner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Siterunner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
<big>'''NASA Earth Sciences 2016 Budget No Longer Cut $500 Million'''</big> | <big>'''NASA Earth Sciences 2016 Budget No Longer Cut $500 Million'''</big> | ||
The final budget bill provides $1.92 billion for Earth Science research | |||
The final budget bill provides $1.92 billion for Earth Science research. The cut is slight compared to initial GOP budget cuts proposed in the House and Senate which had slashed as much as $500 million from the President's request. | |||
NASA administrator Charles Bolden [http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Security argued before Congress this summer and fall] that it was critical to increase the size of NASA's Earth Science programs. | NASA administrator Charles Bolden [http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Environmental_Security argued before Congress this summer and fall] that it was critical to increase the size of NASA's Earth Science programs. | ||
Under the newly passed Fiscal Year 2016 NASA Budget, virtually all of the agency’s programs benefit with either full or added funding. | Under the newly passed Fiscal Year 2016 NASA Budget, virtually all of the agency’s programs benefit with either full or added funding. | ||
[[File:National-Security.001.png]] | [[File:National-Security.001.png]] | ||
http://strategicdemands.com/nasa-pushes-earth-science-to-strengthen-security-capabilities/ | http://strategicdemands.com/nasa-pushes-earth-science-to-strengthen-security-capabilities/ | ||
| Line 124: | Line 127: | ||
; <big>Undercutting Security, 2015/16, US Congress Committees Attempts to Cut Earth Science Research</big> | ; <big>'''''Undercutting Security, 2015/16, US Congress Committees Attempts to Cut Earth Science Research'''''</big> | ||
[http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_and_Space,_Politics '''Earth and Space, Politics'''] | [http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_and_Space,_Politics '''Earth and Space, Politics'''] | ||
[http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/05/01/house-science-committee-guts-nasa-earth-sciences-budget "House Science Committee guts NASA Earth sciences budget... attack on climate research and responses"] | [http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/05/01/house-science-committee-guts-nasa-earth-sciences-budget "House Science Committee guts NASA Earth sciences budget... attack on climate research and responses"] | ||
[http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2015/04/30/proposed-massive-cuts-to-nasa-earth-science-budget-draw-protest/ "Republicans in the House and Senate don't want NASA studying Earth..."] | [http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2015/04/30/proposed-massive-cuts-to-nasa-earth-science-budget-draw-protest/ "Republicans in the House and Senate don't want NASA studying Earth..."] | ||
In | '''Earth Science, NASA Climate Change Research Continues In Peril''' | ||
[http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/04/30/nasa_budget_gop_committee_wants_to_slash_and_burn_earth_sciences.html "Slash and Burn Earth Sciences"] | |||
○ | ○ | ||
[https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/05/01/statement-ostp-director-john-p-holdren-house-proposed-funding-cuts-nasas-critical-ea '''Re: funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs'''] | |||
''' | |||
''On May 1, 2015, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Dr. John P. Holdren issued the following statement on proposed funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs:'' | |||
'''''"If enacted, the NASA authorization bill headed to the House floor later this month would do serious damage to the Nation’s space program, as well as to Earth-observation and Earth-science programs essential for predicting, preparing for, and minimizing the damage from disasters both natural and human-induced...''''' | |||
''The House bill would also gut the NASA “mission to planet Earth”—the satellite observations and related research that provide key measurements and insights relevant to forecasting and tracking hurricanes, fighting wildfires, observing the state of the world’s farms and forests, mapping the extent of droughts, measuring the stocks of groundwater, and monitoring the likelihood of landslides. The draconian cuts in the House bill would also delay advances in our ability to research and prepare for volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and tsunamis and blind us to changes in the Earth’s oceans and ice sheets that can be discerned only from space.'' | |||
'' | ''NASA’s mission to observe, understand, and explore the solar system and the cosmos beyond has long been matched in importance by its mission to use the unrivaled vantage point of Earth orbit for looking downward, to better understand the only home that humanity currently has. It is difficult to understand why, at this time of U.S. leadership in both the outward-facing and inward-facing facets of NASA’s operations in space, the Congress would want to undermine that leadership and sacrifice the panoply of benefits it brings to the Nation."'' | ||
[https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:NASA <big>'''Visit NASA Science @ GreenPolicy360'''</big>] | |||
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ | ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ | ||
Revision as of 18:14, 2 September 2017
GreenPolicy continues to advance new horizons of security -- local, national and global ...
- New Definitions of National & Global Security
- Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ — Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ
- Environmental Security ↔ National Security
- National Security: Enhanced via Environmental Security
- Climate Change / Climate Science
SJS / GreenPolicy360 Siterunner:
Over the decades, in my political work, I have endeavored to develop "new definitions of national security."
In the late 1960s, inspired by the nascent moments of the modern environmental movement with images from an Apollo mission of the Earth rising from beyond the moon, a life-changing January 1969 cover of Life Magazine, and 'Whole Earth' realizations being shared for the first time, I began my involvement in larger strategic questions.
My initial political mentor George E. Brown and new relationships with thoughtful figures such as Dan Ellsberg at Rand Institute in Santa Monica brought insight into war and peace and challenged me.
The opportunity to become involved in the first Earth Day expanded my vision far beyond academic constraints and I began to explore connections between environmental security and international, global affairs.
Today the mission continues: To create a new security paradigm, a school of thought that identifies and advances contours of "real and resilient security".
- Security Brief prepared for the Green Institute by Roger Morris & Steven Schmidt
- Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ Ⅺ Ⅻ --- Ⅻ Ⅺ Ⅹ Ⅸ Ⅷ Ⅶ Ⅵ Ⅴ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅰ
Visit GreenPolicy's Associate -- Strategic Demands
US House of Representatives Majority Party Says 'No' to Pentagon Prepping for Climate Impacts/Disruption
Republicans in US Congress Vote to Block National & Global Security
NASA Earth Sciences 2016 Budget No Longer Cut $500 Million
The final budget bill provides $1.92 billion for Earth Science research. The cut is slight compared to initial GOP budget cuts proposed in the House and Senate which had slashed as much as $500 million from the President's request.
NASA administrator Charles Bolden argued before Congress this summer and fall that it was critical to increase the size of NASA's Earth Science programs.
Under the newly passed Fiscal Year 2016 NASA Budget, virtually all of the agency’s programs benefit with either full or added funding.
http://strategicdemands.com/nasa-pushes-earth-science-to-strengthen-security-capabilities/
- Undercutting Security, 2015/16, US Congress Committees Attempts to Cut Earth Science Research
"Republicans in the House and Senate don't want NASA studying Earth..."
Earth Science, NASA Climate Change Research Continues In Peril
"Slash and Burn Earth Sciences"
○
Re: funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs
On May 1, 2015, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Dr. John P. Holdren issued the following statement on proposed funding cuts to NASA's critical Earth science and space technology programs:
"If enacted, the NASA authorization bill headed to the House floor later this month would do serious damage to the Nation’s space program, as well as to Earth-observation and Earth-science programs essential for predicting, preparing for, and minimizing the damage from disasters both natural and human-induced...
The House bill would also gut the NASA “mission to planet Earth”—the satellite observations and related research that provide key measurements and insights relevant to forecasting and tracking hurricanes, fighting wildfires, observing the state of the world’s farms and forests, mapping the extent of droughts, measuring the stocks of groundwater, and monitoring the likelihood of landslides. The draconian cuts in the House bill would also delay advances in our ability to research and prepare for volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and tsunamis and blind us to changes in the Earth’s oceans and ice sheets that can be discerned only from space.
NASA’s mission to observe, understand, and explore the solar system and the cosmos beyond has long been matched in importance by its mission to use the unrivaled vantage point of Earth orbit for looking downward, to better understand the only home that humanity currently has. It is difficult to understand why, at this time of U.S. leadership in both the outward-facing and inward-facing facets of NASA’s operations in space, the Congress would want to undermine that leadership and sacrifice the panoply of benefits it brings to the Nation."
Visit NASA Science @ GreenPolicy360
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
- The Security Horizon
National Security: Placed at Risk by Undercutting Environmental Security Policy & Practices
(@GreenPolicy360)
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_and_Space,_Politics
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Science_Research_from_Space
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Science_Vital_Signs
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Right_Now
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_Observations
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Earth_Science_from_Space
○
National Security & Environmental Security: Editorial Opinion from GreenPolicy's Associate, Strategic Demands
(@StrategicDemands)
http://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-of-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/priorities-skew-away-from-nasa-and-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/environmental-security-2/
http://strategicdemands.com/security-design/
http://strategicdemands.com/ground-truth/
http://strategicdemands.com/stratdem-factoid-re-road-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/new-definitions-national-security/
http://strategicdemands.com/speaking-environmental-security/
Tag: Eco-nomics, a 21st Century paradigm in development @GreenPolicy360
.jpg)
- About Us
- Additional Website Resources - Linked Data - Green Best Practices
- Atmospheric Science
- Climate Change
- Climate Policy
- Ecology Studies
- Eco-nomics
- Education
- Energy
- Environmental Security
- Environmental Security, National Security
- Environmental Protection
- Global Security
- Green Energy Initiatives
- Health
- National Security
- Natural Resources
- New Definitions of National Security
- Nuclear Nonproliferation
- Nuclear Proliferation
- Nuclear Weapons
- Peace
- Planet Citizen
- Renewable Energy
- Resilience
- Sea-Level Rise & Mitigation
- Strategic Demands
- Sustainability Policies
- US Environmental Protection Agency