Each of us can make a positive difference stepping up & doing our best / Becoming Planet Citizens

Ethics and Climate Change

From Green Policy
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 9: Line 9:
  
  
''In 1977, the head of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, wrote a report for the National Academy of Sciences that concluded that CO2 released during the burning of fossil fuel could have consequences for climate that pose a considerable threat to future society. (White, 1978)''
+
''In 1977, the head of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in 1977, wrote a report for the National Academy of Sciences that concluded that CO2 released during the burning of fossil fuel could have consequences for climate that pose a considerable threat to future society.''
  
 
[https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:US_Public_Law_95-367.png ''Energy & Climate (1977) warning of the National Academy of Sciences'']  
 
[https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:US_Public_Law_95-367.png ''Energy & Climate (1977) warning of the National Academy of Sciences'']  
  
''A government report prepared a few years later in 1981 declared that "[t]he responsibility of the carbon-dioxide problem is ours - we should accept it and act in a way that recognizes our role as trustees for future generations." (Charney et al., 1979) This report also estimated that the amount of warming that would be experienced from a doubling of the pre-industrial levels of CO2 would be 3 degrees C, very close to the amount that the [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/IPCC_Report_Nov_2014 "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change"] would predict almost 30 years later." (Charney et al., 1979)''
+
''A government report prepared a few years later in 1981 declared that "[t]he responsibility of the carbon-dioxide problem is ours - we should accept it and act in a way that recognizes our role as trustees for future generations." (Charney et al., 1979) This report also estimated that the amount of warming that would be experienced from a doubling of the pre-industrial levels of CO2 would be 3 degrees C, very close to the amount that the [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/IPCC_Report_Nov_2014 "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change"] would predict almost 30 years later." ''
  
 
''For over thirty-five years, the US Academy of Sciences has warned the US about the enormous threats of climate change with each successive report making stronger claims that human caused climate change is a serious threat to civilization. If the United States can be accused of failing to live up to its ethical responsibilities to the rest of the world on climate change, one cannot blame the US Academy of Sciences for failing to ring alarm bells. US citizens cannot claim that their most prestigious scientific institutions have failed to take a position on the seriousness of climate change.''
 
''For over thirty-five years, the US Academy of Sciences has warned the US about the enormous threats of climate change with each successive report making stronger claims that human caused climate change is a serious threat to civilization. If the United States can be accused of failing to live up to its ethical responsibilities to the rest of the world on climate change, one cannot blame the US Academy of Sciences for failing to ring alarm bells. US citizens cannot claim that their most prestigious scientific institutions have failed to take a position on the seriousness of climate change.''

Latest revision as of 14:14, 16 January 2020


Climate action m.jpg


Climate Action: An Ethical Responsibility

Beyond Preparing for Crisis Management


In 1977, the head of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in 1977, wrote a report for the National Academy of Sciences that concluded that CO2 released during the burning of fossil fuel could have consequences for climate that pose a considerable threat to future society.

Energy & Climate (1977) warning of the National Academy of Sciences

A government report prepared a few years later in 1981 declared that "[t]he responsibility of the carbon-dioxide problem is ours - we should accept it and act in a way that recognizes our role as trustees for future generations." (Charney et al., 1979) This report also estimated that the amount of warming that would be experienced from a doubling of the pre-industrial levels of CO2 would be 3 degrees C, very close to the amount that the "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change" would predict almost 30 years later."

For over thirty-five years, the US Academy of Sciences has warned the US about the enormous threats of climate change with each successive report making stronger claims that human caused climate change is a serious threat to civilization. If the United States can be accused of failing to live up to its ethical responsibilities to the rest of the world on climate change, one cannot blame the US Academy of Sciences for failing to ring alarm bells. US citizens cannot claim that their most prestigious scientific institutions have failed to take a position on the seriousness of climate change.

The failure of the United States to respond to climate change can be attributed in largest part to a well-financed, well-organized climate change disinformation campaign. As ClimateEthics has previously cited, see "A New Kind of Crime Against Humanity?: The Fossil Fuel Industry's Disinformation Campaign On Climate Change". (Donald Brown, 2010a)

ClimateEthics has also repeatedly argued that the failure of the United States to respond to its ethical duties for climate change may also be attributed to the almost complete failure in the United States of the media and even climate change policy advocates to acknowledge that climate change raises not only national interests but also duties, responsibilities, and obligations to others.



The Ethics and Climate site contains over 185 articles (as of 2017) including 13 videos on ethical issues raised by climate change. The site seeks to help policy makers and interested citizens understand the ethical dimensions of climate change issues in contention in policy debates.


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


Ethics and The National Academy of Sciences

If climate change must be understood as a civilization challenging ethical issue, can the US Academy reports on climate change be criticized on ethical grounds?

The US Academy reports acknowledge that climate change has serious adverse world-wide impacts, that is impacts outside the United States. For instance, in its most recent report, the US Academy concluded that climate change would cause the following world-wide impacts:

Water availability will decrease in many areas that are already drought-prone and in areas where rivers are fed by glaciers or snowpack;

A higher fraction of rainfall will fall in the form of heavy precipitation, increasing the risk of flooding and, in some regions, the spread of water-borne illness;

People and ecosystems in coastal zones will be exposed to higher storm surges, intrusion of salt water into freshwater aquifers, and other risks as sea levels rise;

Coral reefs will experience widespread bleaching as a result of increasing temperatures, rising sea levels, and ocean acidification.



○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


The modern environmental era 'discovers' climate risks and scientific studies are launched with intent to protect...


In the UK

https://www.wired.com/story/meet-the-amateur-scientist-who-discovered-climate-change/ -- About Guy Callendar


In the US


Can our environment be saved? George E. Brown speaks to the US House of Representatives, 1969


Env policy laws US 'the beginning' of env era.jpg


Congressman Brown / Out in Front of Climate Action


National Climate Program Act, 1978 / PDF

Drafted by Congressman Brown, the first federal climate legislation and scientific program to study and act on climate change - global warming.


US Public Law 95-367.png


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


The Initial US Climate Study/Report: Historic


Energy and Climate Report, 1977, National Academy of Sciences / 175 pp. / PDF via GreenPolicy360


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


James Hansen's Warning to Congress in 1988:

Ten years after the National Climate Program Act was drafted by Representative Brown and the legislation's passage led by the Congressman began the federal government's study of climate change, impacts and risks.
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:Hansen-testimony-1988.jpg


Hansen testimony WaPo front page.jpg


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Log in / Create Account
GreenPolicy360
Daily Green Stories
About Our Network
Navigate GreenPolicy
StrategicDemands.com
Facebook
GreenPolicy360 in Focus
"It's All Related"
Global Green New Deal
Going Green
Green 'Vita Activa'
New Visions of Security
Strategic Demands
Earthviews
Countries & Maps
Digital360
Eco-Education
Identify Nature's Species
GreenPolicy Reviews
Online Legis Info (U.S.)
Env Dereg, Climate Litigation
Wiki Ballotpedia (U.S.)
Wiki Politics (U.S.)
Wikimedia Platform
Green News/Dailies
Green News Services (En)
Green Zines (En)
Green Lists @Wikipedia
Climate Action UN News
Climate Agreement / INDCs
Wikipedia on Climate
Climate Denial / Misinfo
GrnNews Reddit Daily
Fact-Checking Sites
GreenPolicy360 & Science
Climate Change - Historic Studies
Climate Change - Current Metrics
Climate Change - MIT
Climate Change - NASA
Worldometer
EcoInternet Search Engine
Ecosia Search Engine
Tools