Category:Externalities: Difference between revisions

From Green Policy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
(26 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<big>'''True-costs / Environmental full-cost accounting'''</big>
<addthis />
 
[[File:Featured.png]]
 
 
::[[File:Acting on Climate Change.png]]
 
 
SJS/GreenPolicy360 -- We/GreenPolicy360 recommend a new descriptor for emissions-externalities-carbon pricing -- Not a tax, let's call it... 
 
+Emissions Cost... +EC
 
 
=='''The By-Products of an Industrial Age'''==
 
 
<big><big>'''Externalities - Emissions - Toxic Chemicals'''</big></big>
 
 
SJS / Siterunner: A worldwide environmental protection movement that took on dangerous conditions to health, life and the overall environment in which we live gained momentum in the 1960s. The tag "green" was given to these diverse political, business, and educational efforts. Green politics covers a vast array of endeavors and initiatives and your GreenPolicy360 siterunner has participated in green environmental efforts since the mid 1960s, especially in the drafting of the US national Green Party platform and via legislative initiatives with US Congressman [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/George_E._Brown_Jr George E. Brown], coalitions and outreach.
 
An essential component of the US [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Category:Green_Platform Green Platform] that I was charged with drafting.
 
As drafter of the formative Green political foundation, I put forward policies that would address the costs of global/local emissions and externalities that are human-caused.
 
Overall, my hope was that more rational, comprehensive  [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/New_Definitions_of_National_Security definitions of security], of real and sustainable security for nations and communities would motivate actions across the globe to preserve and protect life.
 
Human responsibility to [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:You_can_manage_only_what_you_can_measure_Dr_David_Crisp,_OCO-2,_June_2014_m.jpg measure and manage] to avoid harmful and potential tragic consequences is [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:Earth_in_Human_Hands_Intro.png in our hands].
 
Local and far-sighted actions are part of a green vision -- a damage-control mission that focuses on [http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-20/world-pollution-deadlier-than-wars-disasters-hunger/9069776 protecting life and health].
 
Classic liberal capitalism does not take into account "Externalities" ... These missing costs, [https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Environmental_full-cost_accounting an environmental full-cost accounting,] are systemically profound in climate change.
 
The theory of "The Invisible Hand" does not take into account and factor in to climate change the price of carbon burning activities.
 
 
:[[File:Elon Musk quote - gas externality price.png]]
 
 
The following page, identifying externalities, begins to capture some of these new visions and ideas.
 
As business and politics moves into the 21st century we must advanced our awareness of full-cost eco-nomics.
 
For three decades, as environmental advocates, we have pressed green discussion/debate and decision-making.
 
Now is the time to recognize the scope of the challenge and to act together across boundaries, cooperatively.
 
 
<big>○</big>
 
 
<big>'''Environmental full-cost accounting, Climate change and politics'''</big>
 
[https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/File:True-cost_pricing_and_sustainability_excerpt_from_US_Green_Party_Platform_2000.png True-cost pricing position from the founding US Green Party Platform]
 
 
<big>'''Environmental full-cost accounting @GreenPolicy360'''</big>


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Environmental_full-cost_accounting
http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Environmental_full-cost_accounting


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


'''Triple-bottom line'''
<big><font color=blue>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○</font></big>
 
 
<big>'''The Challenge of Acting for the Commons'''</big>
 
* https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/The_Commons
 
 
<big>'''Triple-bottom line'''</big>
 
* http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Triple_Bottom_Line


http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Triple_Bottom_Line


<big><font color=blue>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○</font></big>  
<big><font color=blue>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○</font></big>  
Line 18: Line 82:
The growing impact of climate change is exposing the key fallacy at the heart of the hydrocarbon economy: Big Oil cannot simply exempt itself from the natural economy governing all things in this closed system called planet Earth...   
The growing impact of climate change is exposing the key fallacy at the heart of the hydrocarbon economy: Big Oil cannot simply exempt itself from the natural economy governing all things in this closed system called planet Earth...   


http://image.slidesharecdn.com/greatacceleration2015-150115075518-conversion-gate02/95/great-acceleration-2015-1-638.jpg?cb=1431802701
* http://image.slidesharecdn.com/greatacceleration2015-150115075518-conversion-gate02/95/great-acceleration-2015-1-638.jpg?cb=1431802701
 


'''Externalities Über Alles'''
'''Externalities, More than a Strange-Sounding Science Term'''


An externality is, according to Investopedia, a "consequence of an economic activity that is experienced by unrelated third parties." And externalities can be either positive or negative. It's easy to identify the positive externalities of the hydrocarbon economy. Oil has powered a higher standard of living for millions of people in the global North. Petrochemicals have generated such an agricultural bounty that the United States alone discards up to 40 percent of the food it produces annually without risking famine - yet. And cheap plastic manufacturing allows even many of the poorest members of rich economies unprecedented access to low-cost consumer goods.
An externality is, according to Investopedia, a "consequence of an economic activity that is experienced by unrelated third parties." And externalities can be either positive or negative. It's easy to identify the positive externalities of the hydrocarbon economy. Oil has powered a higher standard of living for millions of people in the global North. Petrochemicals have generated such an agricultural bounty that the United States alone discards up to 40 percent of the food it produces annually without risking famine - yet. And cheap plastic manufacturing allows even many of the poorest members of rich economies unprecedented access to low-cost consumer goods.
Line 26: Line 91:
On the other hand, the hydrocarbon economy has negatively externalized the impact of its business model by emitting greenhouse gases - carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and fluorinated gases - without ever paying for the actual cost of those emissions insofar as they impact the ecosystems upon which their businesses and, increasingly, the lives of their customers depend...
On the other hand, the hydrocarbon economy has negatively externalized the impact of its business model by emitting greenhouse gases - carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and fluorinated gases - without ever paying for the actual cost of those emissions insofar as they impact the ecosystems upon which their businesses and, increasingly, the lives of their customers depend...


'''The Market Correction Is Coming'''


In 2008, the great environmental thinker Lester Brown wrote about the inherent blindness of the invisible hand. Brown lamented the "fundamental weaknesses" preventing it from incorporating "the indirect costs of producing goods" into market prices and bemoaned the fact that it doesn't "value nature's services properly." In the short term, Brown was right. But he underestimated the power of an even larger "economy" at work in the self-correcting system called "planet Earth."
'''Market Corrections'''
 
''In 2008, the environmental thinker Lester Brown wrote about the inherent blindness of the invisible hand. Brown lamented the "fundamental weaknesses" preventing it from incorporating "the indirect costs of producing goods" into market prices and bemoaned the fact that it doesn't "value nature's services properly." In the short term, Brown was right. But he underestimated the power of an even larger "economy" at work in the self-correcting system called "planet Earth."
 
''In less than a decade, Mother Nature's ever more visible hand emerged as a force punishing the "market inefficiencies" and rampant externalization of the hydrocarbon economy. The best indicator of this correction is the mounting loss of "ecosystem services." These are the common goods upon which human civilization - and, truth be told, all life - depends. Yet, humans simply take them for granted.


In less than a decade, Mother Nature's ever more visible hand emerged as a force punishing the "market inefficiencies" and rampant externalization of the hydrocarbon economy. The best indicator of this correction is the mounting loss of "ecosystem services." These are the common goods upon which human civilization - and, truth be told, all life - depends. Yet, humans simply take them for granted.
''It's the clean, clear water, life-sustaining oxygen and life-giving soil.


It's the clean, clear water, life-sustaining oxygen and life-giving soil.
''It's the carbon-capturing forests and carbon-retaining power of the oceans.


It's the carbon-capturing forests and carbon-retaining power of the oceans.
''It's the 1/32 of the planet that is arable land.


It's the 1/32 of the planet that is arable land.
''It's the Arctic region with it crucial permafrost "carbon banks" found in the earth's heretofore frozen regions.''


''Mother Nature is tabulating costs with each passing year as the impact of climate change compounds like bad interest.''
''Permafrost matters because its long-frozen layers safely store greenhouse gases that slowly accumulated over the course of thousands of years. New research estimates a potential $43 trillion global economic impact should those "hundreds of billions" of tons of carbon dioxide and "billions of tons" of methane be released into the atmosphere by the rapidly warming Arctic. As Pacific Standard points out, that bill "isn't a total cost to be spread out over several decades - it's how much we'd have to set aside today to pay for the damage done by melting frozen soil, or permafrost, in the Arctic." And yet more new research shows that Arctic regions are warming twice as fast as the world average because the solar-reflecting properties of the ice and snow are diminishing with each passing year...


Perhaps most pressing, it's the crucial permafrost "carbon banks" found in the earth's heretofore frozen regions. Permafrost matters because its long-frozen layers safely store greenhouse gases that slowly accumulated over the course of thousands of years. New research estimates a potential $43 trillion global economic impact should those "hundreds of billions" of tons of carbon dioxide and "billions of tons" of methane be released into the atmosphere by the rapidly warming Arctic. As Pacific Standard points out, that bill "isn't a total cost to be spread out over several decades - it's how much we'd have to set aside today to pay for the damage done by melting frozen soil, or permafrost, in the Arctic." And yet more new research shows that Arctic regions are warming twice as fast as the world average because the solar-reflecting properties of the ice and snow are diminishing with each passing year...
''Also diminishing each year are the unparalleled "ecosystem services" of the oceans, forests and other food webs that sustain earth's interwoven fabric of life. Based on calculations by scientists at the United Nations University, the world forfeits a "staggering $6.3 trillion to $10.6 trillion" each year just from land degradation. That's roughly "10-17% of global GDP." What are the services lost? Properly cared for land provides "food, poverty reduction, clean water, climate and disease regulation and nutrients cycling."


Also diminishing each year are the unparalleled "ecosystem services" of the oceans, forests and other food webs that sustain earth's interwoven fabric of life. Based on calculations by scientists at the United Nations University, the world forfeits a "staggering $6.3 trillion to $10.6 trillion" each year just from land degradation. That's roughly "10-17% of global GDP." What are the services lost? Properly cared for land provides "food, poverty reduction, clean water, climate and disease regulation and nutrients cycling."
''Hydrocarbon-obsessed humans have long ignored these opportunity costs, but Mother Nature factors it all into her bottom line. And we are running a massive budget deficit. That's why tabulating "environmental services" is crucial to understanding the environmental deficit at the core of the hydrocarbon economy - and it's crucial if human beings want to avoid the ultimate bankruptcy of extinction.


Hydrocarbon-obsessed humans have long ignored these opportunity costs, but Mother Nature factors it all into her bottom line. And we are running a massive budget deficit. That's why tabulating "environmental services" is crucial to understanding the environmental deficit at the core of the hydrocarbon economy - and it's crucial if human beings want to avoid the ultimate bankruptcy of extinction.
''More greenhouse gases equal more warming, equals more carbon released from permafrost, equals less carbon captured by soils, plus oceans equals more warming. On it goes until nature, like theoretically free markets, eventually enforces equilibrium.


More greenhouse gases equal more warming, equals more carbon released from permafrost, equals less carbon captured by soils, plus oceans equals more warming. On it goes until nature, like theoretically free markets, eventually enforces equilibrium.
''Market corrections are coming...''


This mother of all market corrections is coming...


<big><font color=blue>○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○</font></big>
* ''https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Eco-nomics''


* ''https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/New_Definitions_of_National_Security''


* ''https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/The_Commons''


* ''https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_and_Space,_Politics''
* ''https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Earth_Science_Vital_Signs''
* ''https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Time_for_a_Price_on_Carbon''
* ''https://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Anthropogenic_climate_disruption_(ACD)''
○
[[Category:Anthropocene]]
[[Category:Atmospheric Science]]
[[Category:Citizen Science]]
[[Category:Clean Air]]
[[Category:Clean Water]]
[[Category:Climate Change]]
[[Category:Climate Policy]]
[[Category:Earth Science]]
[[Category:Eco-nomics]]
[[Category:Energy]]
[[Category:Environmental Full-cost Accounting]]
[[Category:Environmental Full-cost Accounting]]
[[Category:Global Warming]]
[[Category:Planet Citizens]]
[[Category:Planet Citizens, Planet Scientists]]
[[Category:Plastic Pollution]]
[[Category:Radioactive Pollution]]
[[Category:Business Regulations]]
[[Category:Environmental Protection]]
[[Category:Green Business]]
[[Category:Green Politics]]
[[Category:Pollution]]
[[Category:Renewable Energy]]
[[Category:Resilience]]
[[Category:Recycling]]
[[Category:Sustainability]]
[[Category:Topic]]

Revision as of 18:24, 28 September 2019

<addthis />

Featured.png


Acting on Climate Change.png


SJS/GreenPolicy360 -- We/GreenPolicy360 recommend a new descriptor for emissions-externalities-carbon pricing -- Not a tax, let's call it...

+Emissions Cost... +EC


The By-Products of an Industrial Age

Externalities - Emissions - Toxic Chemicals


SJS / Siterunner: A worldwide environmental protection movement that took on dangerous conditions to health, life and the overall environment in which we live gained momentum in the 1960s. The tag "green" was given to these diverse political, business, and educational efforts. Green politics covers a vast array of endeavors and initiatives and your GreenPolicy360 siterunner has participated in green environmental efforts since the mid 1960s, especially in the drafting of the US national Green Party platform and via legislative initiatives with US Congressman George E. Brown, coalitions and outreach.

An essential component of the US Green Platform that I was charged with drafting.

As drafter of the formative Green political foundation, I put forward policies that would address the costs of global/local emissions and externalities that are human-caused.

Overall, my hope was that more rational, comprehensive definitions of security, of real and sustainable security for nations and communities would motivate actions across the globe to preserve and protect life.

Human responsibility to measure and manage to avoid harmful and potential tragic consequences is in our hands.

Local and far-sighted actions are part of a green vision -- a damage-control mission that focuses on protecting life and health.

Classic liberal capitalism does not take into account "Externalities" ... These missing costs, an environmental full-cost accounting, are systemically profound in climate change.

The theory of "The Invisible Hand" does not take into account and factor in to climate change the price of carbon burning activities.


Elon Musk quote - gas externality price.png


The following page, identifying externalities, begins to capture some of these new visions and ideas.

As business and politics moves into the 21st century we must advanced our awareness of full-cost eco-nomics.

For three decades, as environmental advocates, we have pressed green discussion/debate and decision-making.

Now is the time to recognize the scope of the challenge and to act together across boundaries, cooperatively.


○


Environmental full-cost accounting, Climate change and politics

True-cost pricing position from the founding US Green Party Platform


Environmental full-cost accounting @GreenPolicy360

http://www.greenpolicy360.net/w/Environmental_full-cost_accounting


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


The Challenge of Acting for the Commons


Triple-bottom line


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


Nature's 'Invisible Hand'

Mother Nature's Invisible Hand Strikes Back Against the Carbon Economy

The growing impact of climate change is exposing the key fallacy at the heart of the hydrocarbon economy: Big Oil cannot simply exempt itself from the natural economy governing all things in this closed system called planet Earth...


Externalities, More than a Strange-Sounding Science Term

An externality is, according to Investopedia, a "consequence of an economic activity that is experienced by unrelated third parties." And externalities can be either positive or negative. It's easy to identify the positive externalities of the hydrocarbon economy. Oil has powered a higher standard of living for millions of people in the global North. Petrochemicals have generated such an agricultural bounty that the United States alone discards up to 40 percent of the food it produces annually without risking famine - yet. And cheap plastic manufacturing allows even many of the poorest members of rich economies unprecedented access to low-cost consumer goods.

On the other hand, the hydrocarbon economy has negatively externalized the impact of its business model by emitting greenhouse gases - carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and fluorinated gases - without ever paying for the actual cost of those emissions insofar as they impact the ecosystems upon which their businesses and, increasingly, the lives of their customers depend...


Market Corrections

In 2008, the environmental thinker Lester Brown wrote about the inherent blindness of the invisible hand. Brown lamented the "fundamental weaknesses" preventing it from incorporating "the indirect costs of producing goods" into market prices and bemoaned the fact that it doesn't "value nature's services properly." In the short term, Brown was right. But he underestimated the power of an even larger "economy" at work in the self-correcting system called "planet Earth."

In less than a decade, Mother Nature's ever more visible hand emerged as a force punishing the "market inefficiencies" and rampant externalization of the hydrocarbon economy. The best indicator of this correction is the mounting loss of "ecosystem services." These are the common goods upon which human civilization - and, truth be told, all life - depends. Yet, humans simply take them for granted.

It's the clean, clear water, life-sustaining oxygen and life-giving soil.

It's the carbon-capturing forests and carbon-retaining power of the oceans.

It's the 1/32 of the planet that is arable land.

It's the Arctic region with it crucial permafrost "carbon banks" found in the earth's heretofore frozen regions.

Permafrost matters because its long-frozen layers safely store greenhouse gases that slowly accumulated over the course of thousands of years. New research estimates a potential $43 trillion global economic impact should those "hundreds of billions" of tons of carbon dioxide and "billions of tons" of methane be released into the atmosphere by the rapidly warming Arctic. As Pacific Standard points out, that bill "isn't a total cost to be spread out over several decades - it's how much we'd have to set aside today to pay for the damage done by melting frozen soil, or permafrost, in the Arctic." And yet more new research shows that Arctic regions are warming twice as fast as the world average because the solar-reflecting properties of the ice and snow are diminishing with each passing year...

Also diminishing each year are the unparalleled "ecosystem services" of the oceans, forests and other food webs that sustain earth's interwoven fabric of life. Based on calculations by scientists at the United Nations University, the world forfeits a "staggering $6.3 trillion to $10.6 trillion" each year just from land degradation. That's roughly "10-17% of global GDP." What are the services lost? Properly cared for land provides "food, poverty reduction, clean water, climate and disease regulation and nutrients cycling."

Hydrocarbon-obsessed humans have long ignored these opportunity costs, but Mother Nature factors it all into her bottom line. And we are running a massive budget deficit. That's why tabulating "environmental services" is crucial to understanding the environmental deficit at the core of the hydrocarbon economy - and it's crucial if human beings want to avoid the ultimate bankruptcy of extinction.

More greenhouse gases equal more warming, equals more carbon released from permafrost, equals less carbon captured by soils, plus oceans equals more warming. On it goes until nature, like theoretically free markets, eventually enforces equilibrium.

Market corrections are coming...



○

Subcategories

This category has the following 15 subcategories, out of 15 total.

A

B

E

F

I

  • IOT‎ (2 C, 3 P, 12 F)

P

R

T

W

Pages in category "Externalities"

The following 76 pages are in this category, out of 76 total.

A

C

D

E

F

G

I

L

M

N

O

P

S

T

U

V

W

Y

Media in category "Externalities"

The following 200 files are in this category, out of 581 total.

(previous page) (next page)(previous page) (next page)
Retrieved from "https://greenpolicy360.net/index.php?title=Category:Externalities&oldid=81479"